BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neoplasm that accounts for approximately 10% to 15% of lung cancers. In most cases, the diagnosis relies on cytology and needs to be confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Although several genetic and molecular abnormalities have been recorded, molecular markers able to predict the prognosis are still lacking. MicroRNA (miRNA) signatures have been recently proposed as useful biomarkers in lung cancer because of their high stability during standard sample processing. METHODS: Cytological samples for 50 patients with SCLC were collected from primary tumors (n = 25) and metastases (n = 25) by means of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or bronchial washing (BW); they were fixed in ethanol (FNA) or Duboscq-Brazil fluid (BW). The 3-miRNA panel expression (miR-192, miR-200c, and miR-205) was quantified with a TaqMan polymerase chain reaction miRNA assay and was compared with overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological data. RESULTS: All samples had sufficient RNA for the miRNA expression analysis to be performed, regardless of the sample source or the fixative medium. Patients with a low expression level of the 3-miRNA panel were associated with better OS in univariate (P = .032) and multivariate analyses (P = .022). Moreover, in the group of patients older than the mean age of our cohort (65.8 years), a significant OS advantage (P = .013) was seen for patients with a low expression level of the 3-miRNA panel. CONCLUSIONS: A specific 3-miRNA signature is potentially useful for predicting survival for patients with SCLC, and it may be feasible with cytological samples taken during standard diagnostic procedures.

Prognostic impact of a 3-MicroRNA signature in cytological samples of small cell lung cancer

MANCUSO, GIUSEPPE;RENA, OTTAVIO;RRAPAJ, ELTJONA;BOLDORINI, Renzo Luciano
2016-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neoplasm that accounts for approximately 10% to 15% of lung cancers. In most cases, the diagnosis relies on cytology and needs to be confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Although several genetic and molecular abnormalities have been recorded, molecular markers able to predict the prognosis are still lacking. MicroRNA (miRNA) signatures have been recently proposed as useful biomarkers in lung cancer because of their high stability during standard sample processing. METHODS: Cytological samples for 50 patients with SCLC were collected from primary tumors (n = 25) and metastases (n = 25) by means of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or bronchial washing (BW); they were fixed in ethanol (FNA) or Duboscq-Brazil fluid (BW). The 3-miRNA panel expression (miR-192, miR-200c, and miR-205) was quantified with a TaqMan polymerase chain reaction miRNA assay and was compared with overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological data. RESULTS: All samples had sufficient RNA for the miRNA expression analysis to be performed, regardless of the sample source or the fixative medium. Patients with a low expression level of the 3-miRNA panel were associated with better OS in univariate (P = .032) and multivariate analyses (P = .022). Moreover, in the group of patients older than the mean age of our cohort (65.8 years), a significant OS advantage (P = .013) was seen for patients with a low expression level of the 3-miRNA panel. CONCLUSIONS: A specific 3-miRNA signature is potentially useful for predicting survival for patients with SCLC, and it may be feasible with cytological samples taken during standard diagnostic procedures.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Prognostic impact of a 3-microrna signature in cytological samples of small cell lung cancer - Mancuso et al.pdf

file disponibile agli utenti autorizzati

Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 539.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
539.31 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/74138
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact