INTRODUCTION After an adverse event, not only do patients and family members become victims, but healthcare professionals involved in the event also suffer. More than 50% of all healthcare professionals suffer emotionally and professionally after being involved in an adverse event. Support is needed for these "second victims" to prevent a further negative impact on patient care. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prevalence and content of organizational-level support systems for healthcare professionals involved in an adverse event. METHODS A survey was sent to 109 Belgian hospitals regarding two aspects: first, the availability of a protocol for supporting second victims; and, second, the presence of a contact person in the organization to provide support. Fifty-nine (59) hospitals participated in the study. Based on these results, hospitals were asked to submit their protocols for providing support to second victims. A content analysis based on an Institute for Healthcare Improvement's white paper and the Scott Model was performed to evaluate the protocols. RESULTS Thirty (30) organizations have a systematic plan to support second victims. Twelve percent (12%) cannot identify a contact person. The chief nursing officer is seen as one of the main contact people when something goes wrong. In terms of the quality of the protocols, only a minority follow part of the international resources. CONCLUSIONS A minority of hospitals are somewhat prepared to provide support for healthcare professionals. Management should take a leadership role in establishing support protocols for their healthcare professionals in the aftermath of an adverse event.

Involvement of healthcare professionals in an adverse event: the role of management in supporting their work force.

PANELLA, Massimiliano;
2014-01-01

Abstract

INTRODUCTION After an adverse event, not only do patients and family members become victims, but healthcare professionals involved in the event also suffer. More than 50% of all healthcare professionals suffer emotionally and professionally after being involved in an adverse event. Support is needed for these "second victims" to prevent a further negative impact on patient care. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prevalence and content of organizational-level support systems for healthcare professionals involved in an adverse event. METHODS A survey was sent to 109 Belgian hospitals regarding two aspects: first, the availability of a protocol for supporting second victims; and, second, the presence of a contact person in the organization to provide support. Fifty-nine (59) hospitals participated in the study. Based on these results, hospitals were asked to submit their protocols for providing support to second victims. A content analysis based on an Institute for Healthcare Improvement's white paper and the Scott Model was performed to evaluate the protocols. RESULTS Thirty (30) organizations have a systematic plan to support second victims. Twelve percent (12%) cannot identify a contact person. The chief nursing officer is seen as one of the main contact people when something goes wrong. In terms of the quality of the protocols, only a minority follow part of the international resources. CONCLUSIONS A minority of hospitals are somewhat prepared to provide support for healthcare professionals. Management should take a leadership role in establishing support protocols for their healthcare professionals in the aftermath of an adverse event.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Involvement of healthcare professionals in an adverse event- the role of management in supporting their work force.pdf

file disponibile solo agli amministratori

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 121.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
121.23 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/43353
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact