OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance of polyomavirus (PV) viruria and viremia by morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis (multiplex nested-polymerase chain reaction) in renal transplant patients. STUDY DESIGN: Urine (n=328), serum (n= 53) and renal biopsies (n=24) from renal transplant patients (n=106) were studied. RESULTS: Decoy cells were found in 53 samples (16%) from 19 patients (18%); viral DNA was amplified in all urinary samples and disclosed BK virus (BKV) (n=24), JC virus (JCV) (n=16), and JCV and BKV DNA (n=13). BKV was the prevailing genotype in patients with a high frequency of decoy cell excretion (p = 0.001). JCV excretion correlated with a low number (p = 0.01) and BKV with a high number of decoy cells (p=0.003). PV DNA was amplified from 30/53 serum samples (56.6%); BKV was the prevailing genotype (p = 0.04). On 24 renal biopsies (18 from the decoy cell-negative and 6 from the decoy cell-positive group) PV nephropathy (PVN) was identified and BKV DNA amplified in 4 biopsies, all from the group with a high frequency of decoy cell excretion. PVN was not identified in renal biopsies from the decoy cell-negative group. CONCLUSION: PV infection is frequent in renal transplant patients. The BKV genotype in urine and serum is significantly related to a high frequency and high number of decoy cells. PVN occurs only in patients with BKV viremia and a high number and frequency of decoy cell excretion in urine. In the absence of decoy cells, PVN can be excluded. Cytologic analysis of urine is an important diagnostic tool for screening renal transplant patients at risk of PVN.
Periodic assessment of urine and serum by means on cytology and molecular biology as diagnostic tools of BK virus nephropathy in renal transplanted patients
BOLDORINI, Renzo Luciano;MONGA, Guido
2005-01-01
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance of polyomavirus (PV) viruria and viremia by morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis (multiplex nested-polymerase chain reaction) in renal transplant patients. STUDY DESIGN: Urine (n=328), serum (n= 53) and renal biopsies (n=24) from renal transplant patients (n=106) were studied. RESULTS: Decoy cells were found in 53 samples (16%) from 19 patients (18%); viral DNA was amplified in all urinary samples and disclosed BK virus (BKV) (n=24), JC virus (JCV) (n=16), and JCV and BKV DNA (n=13). BKV was the prevailing genotype in patients with a high frequency of decoy cell excretion (p = 0.001). JCV excretion correlated with a low number (p = 0.01) and BKV with a high number of decoy cells (p=0.003). PV DNA was amplified from 30/53 serum samples (56.6%); BKV was the prevailing genotype (p = 0.04). On 24 renal biopsies (18 from the decoy cell-negative and 6 from the decoy cell-positive group) PV nephropathy (PVN) was identified and BKV DNA amplified in 4 biopsies, all from the group with a high frequency of decoy cell excretion. PVN was not identified in renal biopsies from the decoy cell-negative group. CONCLUSION: PV infection is frequent in renal transplant patients. The BKV genotype in urine and serum is significantly related to a high frequency and high number of decoy cells. PVN occurs only in patients with BKV viremia and a high number and frequency of decoy cell excretion in urine. In the absence of decoy cells, PVN can be excluded. Cytologic analysis of urine is an important diagnostic tool for screening renal transplant patients at risk of PVN.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Periodic assessment of urine and serum by cytology and molecular biology as a diagnostic tool for BKVAN in renal transplant patients - Boldorini et al.pdf
file disponibile solo agli amministratori
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
754.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
754.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.