With its ruling in Louisiana v. Callais on April 29, the U.S. Supreme Court completed a decades-long Republican effort to dismantle the voting rights protections won by minority communities through hard-fought struggles in the middle of the last century. By construing the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended in 1982, in a way that effectively drains it of all substance, the Court once again frustrates Congress’s progressive ambitions and lays bare the increasingly politicized and assertive character of the institution.

Missione compiuta. La Corte Suprema statunitense e il "de profundis" per i diritti civili delle minoranze

grande, elisabetta
2026-01-01

Abstract

With its ruling in Louisiana v. Callais on April 29, the U.S. Supreme Court completed a decades-long Republican effort to dismantle the voting rights protections won by minority communities through hard-fought struggles in the middle of the last century. By construing the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended in 1982, in a way that effectively drains it of all substance, the Court once again frustrates Congress’s progressive ambitions and lays bare the increasingly politicized and assertive character of the institution.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/236904
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact