Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS
OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment through 1-year follow-up in patients stratified by diabetes status in SANTORINI (Treatment of High and Very High riSk Dyslipidemic pAtients for the PreveNTion of CardiOvasculaR Events in Europe - a MultInatioNal ObservatIonal study). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: 623 primary (general practitioners, internal medicine specialists or internists) and secondary (cardiologists, diabetologists, lipidologists or neurologists) care sites in 14 European countries. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7210 high- and very high-cardiovascular risk adults recruited from 17 March 2020 to 11 February 2021. At baseline, patients were grouped as having diabetes, pre-diabetes or normoglycaemia and analysed if they had LDL-C measurement at baseline and 1-year follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The following were assessed by diabetes status at baseline and 1 year: use of LLT, including assessment of monotherapy and combination therapy; LDL-C values and the proportion of patients with LDL-C goal attainment based on the absolute values in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines (high risk: <1.8 mmol/L (55 mg/dL); very high risk: <1.4 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)); and levels of other lipid profile parameters, including non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), HDL-C, triglycerides and total cholesterol. RESULTS: Of 7210 patients, 3181 (44.1%) had diabetes, 1202 (16.7%) pre-diabetes and 2827 (39.2%) normoglycaemia. The majority (72.1%) were male; mean (SD) age was 65.0 (10.9) years. From baseline to 1 year, use of combination therapy increased across all groups, with a smaller increase for patients with diabetes (25.9% to 37.9%) compared with pre-diabetes (28.5% to 43.7%) and normoglycaemia (28.9% to 45.1%). The change in LDL-C levels over 1 year was -0.3 mmol/L in patients with diabetes, -0.4 mmol/L in pre-diabetes and -0.4 mmol/L in normoglycaemia. At 1 year, LDL-C goal attainment increased in each group (diabetes: 26.6% to 34.8%; pre-diabetes: 18.3% to 29.0%; normoglycaemia: 16.4% to 27.3%). CONCLUSIONS: LDL-C goal attainment over 1 year was higher for patients with diabetes than for those with pre-diabetes and normoglycaemia. However, two-thirds of patients with diabetes did not attain their LDL-C goals, which may be attributable to low rates of combination therapy use, highlighting the need to improve lipid management in this high-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04271280.
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol management and goal attainment at 1 year in patients with diabetes, pre-diabetes and normoglycaemia: results from the European, prospective, observational SANTORINI study
OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment through 1-year follow-up in patients stratified by diabetes status in SANTORINI (Treatment of High and Very High riSk Dyslipidemic pAtients for the PreveNTion of CardiOvasculaR Events in Europe - a MultInatioNal ObservatIonal study). DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: 623 primary (general practitioners, internal medicine specialists or internists) and secondary (cardiologists, diabetologists, lipidologists or neurologists) care sites in 14 European countries. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 7210 high- and very high-cardiovascular risk adults recruited from 17 March 2020 to 11 February 2021. At baseline, patients were grouped as having diabetes, pre-diabetes or normoglycaemia and analysed if they had LDL-C measurement at baseline and 1-year follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The following were assessed by diabetes status at baseline and 1 year: use of LLT, including assessment of monotherapy and combination therapy; LDL-C values and the proportion of patients with LDL-C goal attainment based on the absolute values in the 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines (high risk: <1.8 mmol/L (55 mg/dL); very high risk: <1.4 mmol/L (70 mg/dL)); and levels of other lipid profile parameters, including non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), HDL-C, triglycerides and total cholesterol. RESULTS: Of 7210 patients, 3181 (44.1%) had diabetes, 1202 (16.7%) pre-diabetes and 2827 (39.2%) normoglycaemia. The majority (72.1%) were male; mean (SD) age was 65.0 (10.9) years. From baseline to 1 year, use of combination therapy increased across all groups, with a smaller increase for patients with diabetes (25.9% to 37.9%) compared with pre-diabetes (28.5% to 43.7%) and normoglycaemia (28.9% to 45.1%). The change in LDL-C levels over 1 year was -0.3 mmol/L in patients with diabetes, -0.4 mmol/L in pre-diabetes and -0.4 mmol/L in normoglycaemia. At 1 year, LDL-C goal attainment increased in each group (diabetes: 26.6% to 34.8%; pre-diabetes: 18.3% to 29.0%; normoglycaemia: 16.4% to 27.3%). CONCLUSIONS: LDL-C goal attainment over 1 year was higher for patients with diabetes than for those with pre-diabetes and normoglycaemia. However, two-thirds of patients with diabetes did not attain their LDL-C goals, which may be attributable to low rates of combination therapy use, highlighting the need to improve lipid management in this high-risk population. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04271280.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/235342
Citazioni
ND
0
0
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.