Background: To determine whether lung ultrasound (LUS) may early predict the failure of non-invasive respiratory support (high-flow nasal cannula-HFNC, continuous positive airway pressure-CPAP, non-invasive ventilation-NIV) in hypoxemic patients. Methods: In this prospective multicenter international observational study, we enrolled patients undergoing non-invasive treatments for hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg). LUS, PaO2/FiO2 and ROX index were assessed before (baseline) and 2 h after treatment start. Regional/global LUS aeration scores were computed (4 degrees of loss-of-aeration: 0-normal to 3-severe loss of aeration) in 6 regions per hemithorax (2 anterior, 2 lateral, 2 posterior). Failure was defined as need of respiratory support's escalation within 48 h (HFNC to CPAP to NIV, any support to intubation/ECMO). Results: We studied 100 patients (age 70 [57-76] years; female sex 39%; supports: 13 HFNC, 68 CPAP, 19 NIV); the overall rate of treatment failure was 22%. At the baseline, clinical and ultrasound parameters were similar in failing and non-failing patients; after 2 h, failing patients had lower PaO2/FiO2. (149 mmHg [124-201] vs. 200 [171-243]; p = 0.001), lower ROX index (7.8 [4.9-9.2] vs. 10.9 [7.9-13.8]; p = 0.003) and higher lateral (3.0 [1.0-6.0] vs. 1.5 [0.0-3.0]; p = 0.047), antero-lateral (4.0 [1.0-9.0] vs. 2.0 [0.0-4.0]; p = 0.027) and global (13.0 [8.0-17.0] vs. 10.0 [7.0-13.0]; p = 0.036) LUS aeration scores. No improvement in lung aeration was observed in failing patients within the initial 2 h of treatment (global LUS score variations 0.0 [-2.0-1.0] vs. -3.0 [-5.0 - -2.0]; p < 0.001). ROX index and antero-lateral/global LUS scores' variations were independent predictors of failure. AUCs for treatment failure were: 2-hour ROX index 0.71 [0.58-0.84], 2-hour PaO2/FiO2 0.73 [0.60-0.85], global LUS score variations 0.73 [0.62-0.89]. A combined clinical-ultrasound score (ROX-US) showed AUC of 0.82 [0.73-0.91]. A ROX-US≥1 identified the success of the treatment with sensitivity 95% and specificity 50%; a ROX-US≥2 identified the success of the treatment with sensitivity 45% and specificity 96%. Conclusions: Changes in LUS aeration scores induced by 2 h of non-invasive respiratory support help early predict the risk of treatment failure. LUS score improved only in responders and was an independent predictor of failure.
Early lung ultrasound score changes predict the failure of non-invasive respiratory supports in acute hypoxemic patients: a multicenter prospective observational study
De Vita, Nello;Vaschetto, Rosanna;
2026-01-01
Abstract
Background: To determine whether lung ultrasound (LUS) may early predict the failure of non-invasive respiratory support (high-flow nasal cannula-HFNC, continuous positive airway pressure-CPAP, non-invasive ventilation-NIV) in hypoxemic patients. Methods: In this prospective multicenter international observational study, we enrolled patients undergoing non-invasive treatments for hypoxemia (PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg). LUS, PaO2/FiO2 and ROX index were assessed before (baseline) and 2 h after treatment start. Regional/global LUS aeration scores were computed (4 degrees of loss-of-aeration: 0-normal to 3-severe loss of aeration) in 6 regions per hemithorax (2 anterior, 2 lateral, 2 posterior). Failure was defined as need of respiratory support's escalation within 48 h (HFNC to CPAP to NIV, any support to intubation/ECMO). Results: We studied 100 patients (age 70 [57-76] years; female sex 39%; supports: 13 HFNC, 68 CPAP, 19 NIV); the overall rate of treatment failure was 22%. At the baseline, clinical and ultrasound parameters were similar in failing and non-failing patients; after 2 h, failing patients had lower PaO2/FiO2. (149 mmHg [124-201] vs. 200 [171-243]; p = 0.001), lower ROX index (7.8 [4.9-9.2] vs. 10.9 [7.9-13.8]; p = 0.003) and higher lateral (3.0 [1.0-6.0] vs. 1.5 [0.0-3.0]; p = 0.047), antero-lateral (4.0 [1.0-9.0] vs. 2.0 [0.0-4.0]; p = 0.027) and global (13.0 [8.0-17.0] vs. 10.0 [7.0-13.0]; p = 0.036) LUS aeration scores. No improvement in lung aeration was observed in failing patients within the initial 2 h of treatment (global LUS score variations 0.0 [-2.0-1.0] vs. -3.0 [-5.0 - -2.0]; p < 0.001). ROX index and antero-lateral/global LUS scores' variations were independent predictors of failure. AUCs for treatment failure were: 2-hour ROX index 0.71 [0.58-0.84], 2-hour PaO2/FiO2 0.73 [0.60-0.85], global LUS score variations 0.73 [0.62-0.89]. A combined clinical-ultrasound score (ROX-US) showed AUC of 0.82 [0.73-0.91]. A ROX-US≥1 identified the success of the treatment with sensitivity 95% and specificity 50%; a ROX-US≥2 identified the success of the treatment with sensitivity 45% and specificity 96%. Conclusions: Changes in LUS aeration scores induced by 2 h of non-invasive respiratory support help early predict the risk of treatment failure. LUS score improved only in responders and was an independent predictor of failure.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


