: We validated the newly proposed cT1 classification (new cT1a -tumor size ≤3 cm - vs new cT1b -tumor size >3 cm) for renal masses treated with active surveillance (AS). A prospective AS cohort was retrospectively assessed for growth rate and progression (defined as cTNM upstage, volume doubling time [VDT] <12 mo, onset of metastasis, and/or tumor-related death). Out of 130 patients, 22 (17%) had new cT1b tumors. These patients were older (80 vs 69 yr) and with a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (46 vs 63 ml/min/m2). New cT1b masses were more likely to undergo a renal mass biopsy (46% vs 23%), which showed low-grade renal cell carcinoma in most cases. Growth rates were significantly faster for new cT1b masses (median 0.24 vs 0.12 cm/yr, p < 0.001). Overall, progression defined as cTNM upstage or VDT >12 mo occurred in 27 patients (11 new cT1b vs 16 new cT1a tumors). Progression-free survival rates at 24, 36, and 60 mo was 73%, 60%, and 40% for new cT1b versus 95%, 88%, and 79% for new cT1a masses, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models at a landmark of 12 mo, after adjusting for growth rate, the new TNM classification independently predicted progression (hazard ratio = 4.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.91, 11.2, p < 0.001). The major limitations are the retrospective nature and the lack of renal mass biopsies in a proportion of cases. Our results validated the new cT1a classification system, which may better select patients eligible for AS.
New TNM Staging System Predicts Progression of Small Renal Masses Under Active Surveillance: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single-center Prospective Series
Volpe, Alessandro;Palumbo, Carlotta
2025-01-01
Abstract
: We validated the newly proposed cT1 classification (new cT1a -tumor size ≤3 cm - vs new cT1b -tumor size >3 cm) for renal masses treated with active surveillance (AS). A prospective AS cohort was retrospectively assessed for growth rate and progression (defined as cTNM upstage, volume doubling time [VDT] <12 mo, onset of metastasis, and/or tumor-related death). Out of 130 patients, 22 (17%) had new cT1b tumors. These patients were older (80 vs 69 yr) and with a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (46 vs 63 ml/min/m2). New cT1b masses were more likely to undergo a renal mass biopsy (46% vs 23%), which showed low-grade renal cell carcinoma in most cases. Growth rates were significantly faster for new cT1b masses (median 0.24 vs 0.12 cm/yr, p < 0.001). Overall, progression defined as cTNM upstage or VDT >12 mo occurred in 27 patients (11 new cT1b vs 16 new cT1a tumors). Progression-free survival rates at 24, 36, and 60 mo was 73%, 60%, and 40% for new cT1b versus 95%, 88%, and 79% for new cT1a masses, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models at a landmark of 12 mo, after adjusting for growth rate, the new TNM classification independently predicted progression (hazard ratio = 4.63, 95% confidence interval: 1.91, 11.2, p < 0.001). The major limitations are the retrospective nature and the lack of renal mass biopsies in a proportion of cases. Our results validated the new cT1a classification system, which may better select patients eligible for AS.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


