Background: The pathogenesis of HIV-associated neurocognitive (NC) impairment is multifactorial, and antiretroviral (ARV) neurotoxicity may contribute. However, interventional pharmacological studies are limited. Methods: Single-blind, randomized (1:1), controlled trial to assess the change of NC performance (Global Deficit Score, GDS, and domain scores) in PLWH with NC impairment randomized to continue their standard of care treatment or to switch to a less neurotoxic ARV regimen: darunavir/cobicistat, maraviroc, emtricitabine (MARAND-X). Participants had plasma and cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA, 50 copies/mL, R5-tropic HIV, and were on ARV regimens that did not include efavirenz and darunavir. The change of resting-state electroencephalography was also evaluated. The outcomes were assessed at week 24 of the intervention through tests for longitudinal paired data and mixed-effect models. Results: Thirty-eight participants were enrolled and 28 completed the follow-up. Global Deficit Score improved over time but with no difference between arms in longitudinal adjusted models. Perceptual functions improved in the MARAND-X, while long-term memory improved only in participants within the MARAND-X for whom the central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CNS penetration effectiveness) score increased by $3. No significant changes in resting-state electroencephalography were observed. Conclusions: In this small but well-controlled study, the use of less neurotoxic ARV showed no major beneficial effect over an unchanged regimen. The beneficial effects on the memory domain of increasing CNS penetration effectiveness score suggest that ARV neuropenetration may have a role in cognitive function.

Switching to Low Neurotoxic Antiretrovirals to Improve Neurocognition Among People Living With HIV-1-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder: The MARAND-X Randomized Clinical Trial

Calcagno, Andrea
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background: The pathogenesis of HIV-associated neurocognitive (NC) impairment is multifactorial, and antiretroviral (ARV) neurotoxicity may contribute. However, interventional pharmacological studies are limited. Methods: Single-blind, randomized (1:1), controlled trial to assess the change of NC performance (Global Deficit Score, GDS, and domain scores) in PLWH with NC impairment randomized to continue their standard of care treatment or to switch to a less neurotoxic ARV regimen: darunavir/cobicistat, maraviroc, emtricitabine (MARAND-X). Participants had plasma and cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA, 50 copies/mL, R5-tropic HIV, and were on ARV regimens that did not include efavirenz and darunavir. The change of resting-state electroencephalography was also evaluated. The outcomes were assessed at week 24 of the intervention through tests for longitudinal paired data and mixed-effect models. Results: Thirty-eight participants were enrolled and 28 completed the follow-up. Global Deficit Score improved over time but with no difference between arms in longitudinal adjusted models. Perceptual functions improved in the MARAND-X, while long-term memory improved only in participants within the MARAND-X for whom the central nervous system penetration-effectiveness (CNS penetration effectiveness) score increased by $3. No significant changes in resting-state electroencephalography were observed. Conclusions: In this small but well-controlled study, the use of less neurotoxic ARV showed no major beneficial effect over an unchanged regimen. The beneficial effects on the memory domain of increasing CNS penetration effectiveness score suggest that ARV neuropenetration may have a role in cognitive function.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
MARANDX_primary_Lazzaro_JAIDS2024.pdf

file disponibile solo agli amministratori

Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 436.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
436.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/216821
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact