Almost twenty years after the death of Reinhart Koselleck, scholarly interest in his work continues to grow, as evidenced by a wide range of recent critical literature. Stefan-Lud- wig Hoffmann’s recent volume, Der Riss in der Zeit, offers a comprehensive reading of Koselleck’s oeuvre and aims to reconstruct the Historik that was never written. Special attention is devoted to his wartime experience and imprisonment in the Soviet Union, as well as to his intellectual elaboration of Nazism. In the second half of his career, Koselleck favoured the short essay form to develop a conception of history grounded in the intersec- tion of lived experience, political theory, and epistemological reflection. The author criti- cally reconstructs Koselleck’s formative context and intellectual relationships (from Kühn to Schmitt), tracing the evolution of his thought from Kritik und Krise to the maturation of key concepts such as «temporal layers» (Zeitschichten) and «past future» (vergangene Zu- kunft). Hoffmann shows how Koselleck’s «experiential science» came to embrace hetero- dox sources and languages – from psychoanalysis to individual memory – without ever abandoning the rigour of historical method. The volume invites renewed reflection on Koselleck’s contemporary relevance as a critical interpreter of modernity, suggesting that his historiographical legacy, far from being exhausted, remains open to new readings.

Koselleck e la Historik che non scrisse

Tortarolo
2025-01-01

Abstract

Almost twenty years after the death of Reinhart Koselleck, scholarly interest in his work continues to grow, as evidenced by a wide range of recent critical literature. Stefan-Lud- wig Hoffmann’s recent volume, Der Riss in der Zeit, offers a comprehensive reading of Koselleck’s oeuvre and aims to reconstruct the Historik that was never written. Special attention is devoted to his wartime experience and imprisonment in the Soviet Union, as well as to his intellectual elaboration of Nazism. In the second half of his career, Koselleck favoured the short essay form to develop a conception of history grounded in the intersec- tion of lived experience, political theory, and epistemological reflection. The author criti- cally reconstructs Koselleck’s formative context and intellectual relationships (from Kühn to Schmitt), tracing the evolution of his thought from Kritik und Krise to the maturation of key concepts such as «temporal layers» (Zeitschichten) and «past future» (vergangene Zu- kunft). Hoffmann shows how Koselleck’s «experiential science» came to embrace hetero- dox sources and languages – from psychoanalysis to individual memory – without ever abandoning the rigour of historical method. The volume invites renewed reflection on Koselleck’s contemporary relevance as a critical interpreter of modernity, suggesting that his historiographical legacy, far from being exhausted, remains open to new readings.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
08_tortarolo.pdf

file disponibile solo agli amministratori

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 105.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
105.84 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/214782
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact