PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of reducing unnecessary biopsies in patients with BI-RADS 3 lesions by implementing Kaiser score (KS). METHOD: In this retrospective, single-center study, we included 79 female patients with BI-RADS 3 lesions and risk factors who underwent biopsy following magnetic resonance imaging. Three readers (two experienced breast radiologists and a radiology resident) blinded evaluated the lesions using KS. Lesions with a KS ≤ 4 were considered benign. Results were compared with the histopathological findings (gold standard) assessing sensitivity and specificity along with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for each reader. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Fleiss’ kappa with 95 % CIs. Moreover, Cohen's kappa was used to assess concordance between two readers at time. RESULTS: 79 female patients (mean age, 50.9 ± 12.2 (standard deviation)) were evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the three readers was excellent: 0.99, 0.99, and 0.90), respectively. The sensitivity of the two breast radiologists and the resident was 0.92 (95 % CI: 0.62 – 0.99), 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.95 – 1.00) and 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.42 – 0.95), respectively, while the specificity was 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.95–––1.00), 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.92 – 1.00), and 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.95 – 1.00) respectively. By using a KS ≤ 4 value to indicate benignity, 66 to 67 biopsies (84 to 85 % of all the biopsies) would have been avoided. Inter-reader concordance via Fleiss’ kappa was 0.792 (95 % CI: 0.68 – 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of KS could have spared 84–85% of biopsies, proving to be a quick, user-friendly tool with strong inter-observer agreement and high specificity.

Diagnostic Performance of Kaiser score in MRI BI-RADS 3 Lesions: A Promising tool to reduce unnecessary biopsies

Ostillio, Eleonora
Conceptualization
;
Razzini, Davide
Methodology
;
Groenhoff, Léon
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Tambasco, Anna
Methodology
;
Carriero, Alessandro
Conceptualization
;
Costantini, Pietro
Formal Analysis
2024-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of reducing unnecessary biopsies in patients with BI-RADS 3 lesions by implementing Kaiser score (KS). METHOD: In this retrospective, single-center study, we included 79 female patients with BI-RADS 3 lesions and risk factors who underwent biopsy following magnetic resonance imaging. Three readers (two experienced breast radiologists and a radiology resident) blinded evaluated the lesions using KS. Lesions with a KS ≤ 4 were considered benign. Results were compared with the histopathological findings (gold standard) assessing sensitivity and specificity along with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for each reader. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using Fleiss’ kappa with 95 % CIs. Moreover, Cohen's kappa was used to assess concordance between two readers at time. RESULTS: 79 female patients (mean age, 50.9 ± 12.2 (standard deviation)) were evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the three readers was excellent: 0.99, 0.99, and 0.90), respectively. The sensitivity of the two breast radiologists and the resident was 0.92 (95 % CI: 0.62 – 0.99), 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.95 – 1.00) and 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.42 – 0.95), respectively, while the specificity was 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.95–––1.00), 0.99 (95 % CI: 0.92 – 1.00), and 1.00 (95 % CI: 0.95 – 1.00) respectively. By using a KS ≤ 4 value to indicate benignity, 66 to 67 biopsies (84 to 85 % of all the biopsies) would have been avoided. Inter-reader concordance via Fleiss’ kappa was 0.792 (95 % CI: 0.68 – 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of KS could have spared 84–85% of biopsies, proving to be a quick, user-friendly tool with strong inter-observer agreement and high specificity.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/196702
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact