Purpose : Lifestyle medicine interventions combining physical, nutritional, and psychological components have been found effective in general older population. However, evidence from the long-term care (LTC) is scarce. Methods : We conducted a pragmatic, two-arm, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial. Residents living in a LTC facility for one or more years, able to discern and to express informed consent, and requiring nursing care were considered eligible. The three-months intervention combined bi-weekly physical exercise groups, a healthy diet, and weekly psychological wellbeing sessions. Patients of the control group were subjected to routine care. At the end of the study participants were assessed using Barthel Index, Katz Activities of Daily Living, and Tinetti scales. Results : A total of 54 patients with a mean age of 84 years took part to the study. Physical exercise and psychological wellbeing sessions were mostly attended by all the subjects of the intervention group. Both groups took less calories than planned in the diets; in addition, the intervention group showed a lower energy and carbohydrates intake than the control group. At the end of the study, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in the total scores of all the scales. Conclusions : This intervention was effective in improving functionality in older people living in the LTC setting. Results were achieved in a short timeframe, likely due to synergistic interactions between components. However, a further exploration of underlying factors is needed, to better understand the barriers that hampered a complete intervention delivery in this context.

Effectiveness of a Combined Lifestyle Intervention for older people in Long-Term Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Andrea Conti;Diego Concina;Annalisa Opizzi;Carmela Rinaldi;Sophia Russotto;Elena Grossini;Carla Maria Gramaglia;Patrizia Zeppegno;Massimiliano Panella
2024-01-01

Abstract

Purpose : Lifestyle medicine interventions combining physical, nutritional, and psychological components have been found effective in general older population. However, evidence from the long-term care (LTC) is scarce. Methods : We conducted a pragmatic, two-arm, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial. Residents living in a LTC facility for one or more years, able to discern and to express informed consent, and requiring nursing care were considered eligible. The three-months intervention combined bi-weekly physical exercise groups, a healthy diet, and weekly psychological wellbeing sessions. Patients of the control group were subjected to routine care. At the end of the study participants were assessed using Barthel Index, Katz Activities of Daily Living, and Tinetti scales. Results : A total of 54 patients with a mean age of 84 years took part to the study. Physical exercise and psychological wellbeing sessions were mostly attended by all the subjects of the intervention group. Both groups took less calories than planned in the diets; in addition, the intervention group showed a lower energy and carbohydrates intake than the control group. At the end of the study, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in the total scores of all the scales. Conclusions : This intervention was effective in improving functionality in older people living in the LTC setting. Results were achieved in a short timeframe, likely due to synergistic interactions between components. However, a further exploration of underlying factors is needed, to better understand the barriers that hampered a complete intervention delivery in this context.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
aging paper.pdf

file ad accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione Editoriale (PDF)
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 752.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
752.28 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/170062
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact