With our new home-built circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) instrument, we measured fluorescence and CPL spectra of the enantiomeric pairs of two quasi-isomeric BODIPY DYEmers 1 and 2, endowed with axial chirality. The electronic circular dichroism (ECD) and CPL spectra of these atropisomeric dimers are dominated by the exciton coupling between the main π–π* transitions (550–560 nm) of the two BODIPY rings. Compound 1 has strong ECD and CPL spectra (glum=4×10−3) well reproduced by TD-DFT and SCS-CC2 (spin-component scaled second-order approximate coupled-cluster) calculations using DFT-optimized ground- and excited-state structures. Compound 2 has weaker ECD and CPL spectra (glum=4×10−4), partly due to the mutual cancellation of electric–electric and electric–magnetic exciton couplings, and partly to its conformational freedom. This compound is computationally very challenging. Starting from the optimized excited-state geometries, we predicted the wrong sign for the CPL band of 2 using TD-DFT with the most recommended hybrid and range-separated functionals, whereas SCS-CC2 or a DFT functional with full exact exchange provided the correct sign.

Circularly Polarized Luminescence from Axially Chiral BODIPY DYEmers: An Experimental and Computational Study

GUIDO, Ciro Achille;
2016-01-01

Abstract

With our new home-built circularly polarized luminescence (CPL) instrument, we measured fluorescence and CPL spectra of the enantiomeric pairs of two quasi-isomeric BODIPY DYEmers 1 and 2, endowed with axial chirality. The electronic circular dichroism (ECD) and CPL spectra of these atropisomeric dimers are dominated by the exciton coupling between the main π–π* transitions (550–560 nm) of the two BODIPY rings. Compound 1 has strong ECD and CPL spectra (glum=4×10−3) well reproduced by TD-DFT and SCS-CC2 (spin-component scaled second-order approximate coupled-cluster) calculations using DFT-optimized ground- and excited-state structures. Compound 2 has weaker ECD and CPL spectra (glum=4×10−4), partly due to the mutual cancellation of electric–electric and electric–magnetic exciton couplings, and partly to its conformational freedom. This compound is computationally very challenging. Starting from the optimized excited-state geometries, we predicted the wrong sign for the CPL band of 2 using TD-DFT with the most recommended hybrid and range-separated functionals, whereas SCS-CC2 or a DFT functional with full exact exchange provided the correct sign.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BODIPY_CEJ_2016_postprint.pdf

file disponibile solo agli amministratori

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 884.45 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
884.45 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
chem.201602684.pdf

file disponibile solo agli amministratori

Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.24 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/146621
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 108
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 106
social impact