As the production of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) is becoming more prevalent, it is becoming increasingly necessary to understand the toxicological effects they can have on different ecosystems. In the marine bioindicator species M. galloprovincialis Lam we predicted toxicity and bioaccumulation of 5 nm alkane-coated and 50 nm uncoated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) along with silver nitrate as a function of the actual dose level. We generated a time persistence model of silver in seawater and used the Area Under the Curve (AUC) as independent variable in the hazard assessment. This approach allowed us to evaluate unbiased ecotoxicological endpoints for acute (survival) and chronic toxicity (byssal adhesion). Logistic regression analysis rendered an overall LC5096h values of 0.81 ± 0.07 mg h L−1 irrespectively of the silver form. By contrast, for byssal adhesion regression analysis revealed a much higher toxicological potential of silver nitrate vs AgNPs with EC5024h values respectively of 0.0024 ± 0.0009 vs 0.053 ± 0.016 and 0.063 (no computable error for 50 nm AgNP) mg h L−1, undoubtedly confirming a prevalence of ionic silver effects over AgNPs. Bioaccumulation was more efficient for silver nitrate >5 nm AgNP >50 nm AgNP reflecting a parallel with the preferential uptake route / target organ. Finally, we derived Risk Quotient (RQs) for acute and chronic effects of nanosilver in shellfish and showed that the RQs are far from the Level of Concern (LoC) at current estimated environmental concentrations (EECs). This information can ultimately help researchers, policy makers, and industry professionals decide how to safely regulate and/or dispose of AgNPs.

Ecotoxicological effects of silver nanoparticles in marine mussels

Antonio Calisi;Candida Lorusso;Francesco Dondero
2022-01-01

Abstract

As the production of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) is becoming more prevalent, it is becoming increasingly necessary to understand the toxicological effects they can have on different ecosystems. In the marine bioindicator species M. galloprovincialis Lam we predicted toxicity and bioaccumulation of 5 nm alkane-coated and 50 nm uncoated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) along with silver nitrate as a function of the actual dose level. We generated a time persistence model of silver in seawater and used the Area Under the Curve (AUC) as independent variable in the hazard assessment. This approach allowed us to evaluate unbiased ecotoxicological endpoints for acute (survival) and chronic toxicity (byssal adhesion). Logistic regression analysis rendered an overall LC5096h values of 0.81 ± 0.07 mg h L−1 irrespectively of the silver form. By contrast, for byssal adhesion regression analysis revealed a much higher toxicological potential of silver nitrate vs AgNPs with EC5024h values respectively of 0.0024 ± 0.0009 vs 0.053 ± 0.016 and 0.063 (no computable error for 50 nm AgNP) mg h L−1, undoubtedly confirming a prevalence of ionic silver effects over AgNPs. Bioaccumulation was more efficient for silver nitrate >5 nm AgNP >50 nm AgNP reflecting a parallel with the preferential uptake route / target organ. Finally, we derived Risk Quotient (RQs) for acute and chronic effects of nanosilver in shellfish and showed that the RQs are far from the Level of Concern (LoC) at current estimated environmental concentrations (EECs). This information can ultimately help researchers, policy makers, and industry professionals decide how to safely regulate and/or dispose of AgNPs.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2021.07.19.452197v1.full.pdf

file ad accesso aperto

Descrizione: bioxriv preprint
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print
Licenza: Non specificato
Dimensione 388.66 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
388.66 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/144367
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact