In this essay, I aim at deepening into the intertextuality which binds Cristóbal de Salazar Mardones’ "Ilustración y defensa de la Fábula de Píramo y Tisbe" (1636) to Francisco Fernández de Córdoba’s "Examen del Antídoto o Apología por las Soledades de don Luis de Góngora contra el autor del Antídoto" (1617). The article will be divided into two parts: in the first one, I will focus on the debts that this and other works of the debate over Góngora’s poetry show towards the abbot of Rute’s text; in the second one, based on few textual variants, I will try to identify which manuscript of "Examen" Salazar Mardones probably handled in order to write several fragments of his "Ilustración".
La "Ilustración y defensa de la Fábula de Píramo y Tisbe" (1636) de Cristóbal de Salazar Mardones y el "Examen del Antídoto" (1617) del abad de Rute: crítica literaria y crítica del texto
Matteo Mancinelli
2019-01-01
Abstract
In this essay, I aim at deepening into the intertextuality which binds Cristóbal de Salazar Mardones’ "Ilustración y defensa de la Fábula de Píramo y Tisbe" (1636) to Francisco Fernández de Córdoba’s "Examen del Antídoto o Apología por las Soledades de don Luis de Góngora contra el autor del Antídoto" (1617). The article will be divided into two parts: in the first one, I will focus on the debts that this and other works of the debate over Góngora’s poetry show towards the abbot of Rute’s text; in the second one, based on few textual variants, I will try to identify which manuscript of "Examen" Salazar Mardones probably handled in order to write several fragments of his "Ilustración".I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
