The aim of this paper is to examine the Italian prefix stra-, by focusing on its diachronic evolution in the written language (from 12th century Literature to 20th century Literature). In Modern Italian, stra- (derived from the Latin adverb and preposition extra ‘outside; beyond’) is classified as belonging to the morphological category of evaluative prefixes with an augmentative function. More precisely, given that, across languages, the semantic values typically associated with evaluative morphology are small/big (‘quantitative dimension’), and good/bad (‘qualitative dimension’), stra- is considered as denoting the qualitative meaning good. Using a corpus-based analysis, I will show how since its origins stra- may express also the qualitative meaning bad, especially if it occurs with verbal bases. It will be further suggested that a diachronic reason may be invoked in order to explain why at first this prefix is used mainly with adjectives and also with verbs (although to a lesser extent), whereas it is not extended to nouns (with a few exceptions; indeed, stra- is productively applied to nouns only recently). This contradicts a well-known cross-linguistic tendency on the basis of which evaluative affixes primarily combine with the category Noun, and only afterwards with the category Adjective and the category Verb.
Uno stra-prefisso: l'evoluzione di stra- nella storia dell'italiano
NAPOLI, Maria
2012-01-01
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to examine the Italian prefix stra-, by focusing on its diachronic evolution in the written language (from 12th century Literature to 20th century Literature). In Modern Italian, stra- (derived from the Latin adverb and preposition extra ‘outside; beyond’) is classified as belonging to the morphological category of evaluative prefixes with an augmentative function. More precisely, given that, across languages, the semantic values typically associated with evaluative morphology are small/big (‘quantitative dimension’), and good/bad (‘qualitative dimension’), stra- is considered as denoting the qualitative meaning good. Using a corpus-based analysis, I will show how since its origins stra- may express also the qualitative meaning bad, especially if it occurs with verbal bases. It will be further suggested that a diachronic reason may be invoked in order to explain why at first this prefix is used mainly with adjectives and also with verbs (although to a lesser extent), whereas it is not extended to nouns (with a few exceptions; indeed, stra- is productively applied to nouns only recently). This contradicts a well-known cross-linguistic tendency on the basis of which evaluative affixes primarily combine with the category Noun, and only afterwards with the category Adjective and the category Verb.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Napoli 2012_stra-_RILD.pdf
file disponibile agli utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
165.55 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
165.55 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.