This study aimed to standardize the clomiphene citrate test (CC-t) in our laboratory while comparing two different protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders. One hundred and forty-four patients scheduled for assisted reproductive techniques were submitted to the CC-t within 3 months before starting stimulation; 133 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with a blocking protocol. Poor responders in the first cycle (n = 30) were subsequently treated with a flare-up protocol. Although it was not statistically significant, more patients reached oocyte retrieval with the flare-up protocol. In the completed cycles, more gonadotrophin ampules (55 ± 15 vs. 34 ± 13; p < 0.001) and more stimulation days (12.6 ± 1 vs. 11.6 ± 1.2; p < 0.005) were needed in the blocking than in the flare-up protocol. No difference was observed in peak 17β-estradiol levels, preovulatory follicles, oocytes retrieved or pregnancy rate between the two protocols. According to the threshold values, established on CC-t of patients who obtained a clinical pregnancy (n = 44), the incidence of abnormal results was 10%. All but one patient with abnormal CC-t were poor responders during the first stimulation cycle. The flare-up protocol did not improve the ovarian response in these patients.
Comparison of a blocking vs. a flare-up protocol in poor responders with a normal and abnormal clomiphene citrate challenge test
Remorgida V.;
1997-01-01
Abstract
This study aimed to standardize the clomiphene citrate test (CC-t) in our laboratory while comparing two different protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders. One hundred and forty-four patients scheduled for assisted reproductive techniques were submitted to the CC-t within 3 months before starting stimulation; 133 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with a blocking protocol. Poor responders in the first cycle (n = 30) were subsequently treated with a flare-up protocol. Although it was not statistically significant, more patients reached oocyte retrieval with the flare-up protocol. In the completed cycles, more gonadotrophin ampules (55 ± 15 vs. 34 ± 13; p < 0.001) and more stimulation days (12.6 ± 1 vs. 11.6 ± 1.2; p < 0.005) were needed in the blocking than in the flare-up protocol. No difference was observed in peak 17β-estradiol levels, preovulatory follicles, oocytes retrieved or pregnancy rate between the two protocols. According to the threshold values, established on CC-t of patients who obtained a clinical pregnancy (n = 44), the incidence of abnormal results was 10%. All but one patient with abnormal CC-t were poor responders during the first stimulation cycle. The flare-up protocol did not improve the ovarian response in these patients.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
gynecolendocrinol1997.pdf
file disponibile solo agli amministratori
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print
Licenza:
DRM non definito
Dimensione
4.65 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.65 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.