This study aimed to standardize the clomiphene citrate test (CC-t) in our laboratory while comparing two different protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders. One hundred and forty-four patients scheduled for assisted reproductive techniques were submitted to the CC-t within 3 months before starting stimulation; 133 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with a blocking protocol. Poor responders in the first cycle (n = 30) were subsequently treated with a flare-up protocol. Although it was not statistically significant, more patients reached oocyte retrieval with the flare-up protocol. In the completed cycles, more gonadotrophin ampules (55 ± 15 vs. 34 ± 13; p < 0.001) and more stimulation days (12.6 ± 1 vs. 11.6 ± 1.2; p < 0.005) were needed in the blocking than in the flare-up protocol. No difference was observed in peak 17β-estradiol levels, preovulatory follicles, oocytes retrieved or pregnancy rate between the two protocols. According to the threshold values, established on CC-t of patients who obtained a clinical pregnancy (n = 44), the incidence of abnormal results was 10%. All but one patient with abnormal CC-t were poor responders during the first stimulation cycle. The flare-up protocol did not improve the ovarian response in these patients.

Comparison of a blocking vs. a flare-up protocol in poor responders with a normal and abnormal clomiphene citrate challenge test

Remorgida V.;
1997-01-01

Abstract

This study aimed to standardize the clomiphene citrate test (CC-t) in our laboratory while comparing two different protocols of controlled ovarian stimulation in poor responders. One hundred and forty-four patients scheduled for assisted reproductive techniques were submitted to the CC-t within 3 months before starting stimulation; 133 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation with a blocking protocol. Poor responders in the first cycle (n = 30) were subsequently treated with a flare-up protocol. Although it was not statistically significant, more patients reached oocyte retrieval with the flare-up protocol. In the completed cycles, more gonadotrophin ampules (55 ± 15 vs. 34 ± 13; p < 0.001) and more stimulation days (12.6 ± 1 vs. 11.6 ± 1.2; p < 0.005) were needed in the blocking than in the flare-up protocol. No difference was observed in peak 17β-estradiol levels, preovulatory follicles, oocytes retrieved or pregnancy rate between the two protocols. According to the threshold values, established on CC-t of patients who obtained a clinical pregnancy (n = 44), the incidence of abnormal results was 10%. All but one patient with abnormal CC-t were poor responders during the first stimulation cycle. The flare-up protocol did not improve the ovarian response in these patients.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
gynecolendocrinol1997.pdf

file disponibile solo agli amministratori

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: DRM non definito
Dimensione 4.65 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.65 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/117932
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact