The EU law and the ECHR still did not provide a clear conceptual framework for the definition of the dividing line between administrative and criminal offences. The progressive and mutual collaboration between the two European courts will evidently once again be deeply disturbed, Strasbourg going one way and Luxembourg going the other way. Furthermore, the protection of a non-derogable individual right such as ne bis in idem must not be left to the discretion of States. In a de iure condendo perspective, the surest manner of ensuring compliance with Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 is the legislative provision, at some appropriate stage, of a single-track procedure. In the meanwhile, different pronouncements by the tax and the criminal Court on the same facts, based on a different assessment of the same evidence, calls into question the authority of the State. The Italian Supreme Court is still approaching the topic with caution, worrying about the non-favorable deviation from domestic law. A comprehensive legislative solution should be the best solution; but it is still far to come.

IL DIVIETO DI BIS IN IDEM NEL SISTEMA REPRESSIVO PENALE TRIBUTARIO

Roberto Succio
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
2020-01-01

Abstract

The EU law and the ECHR still did not provide a clear conceptual framework for the definition of the dividing line between administrative and criminal offences. The progressive and mutual collaboration between the two European courts will evidently once again be deeply disturbed, Strasbourg going one way and Luxembourg going the other way. Furthermore, the protection of a non-derogable individual right such as ne bis in idem must not be left to the discretion of States. In a de iure condendo perspective, the surest manner of ensuring compliance with Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 is the legislative provision, at some appropriate stage, of a single-track procedure. In the meanwhile, different pronouncements by the tax and the criminal Court on the same facts, based on a different assessment of the same evidence, calls into question the authority of the State. The Italian Supreme Court is still approaching the topic with caution, worrying about the non-favorable deviation from domestic law. A comprehensive legislative solution should be the best solution; but it is still far to come.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Succio_IDE_2_1_2020.pdf

file ad accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print
Licenza: Dominio pubblico
Dimensione 623.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
623.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11579/117650
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact